When content feels generic, the instinct is to blame the agency’s writers or switch to a new one. That rarely fixes it. The real gap is almost always the strategic layer that should sit above the agency: the positioning, the point of view, and the proprietary insight that gives content something to say. This blog explains what that layer looks like and how to build it so your agency has something real to work with.
In This Article
The problem usually isn’t the agency’s writing. It’s what they were given to work with before they started writing.
If you’ve switched agencies once already and the new content still feels flat, that’s a signal worth paying attention to. Two different agencies producing the same generic result points to something upstream of both of them.
Agencies are good at execution, research, writing, formatting, and publishing on schedule. What they can’t manufacture on their own is a distinct point of view about your market. If you hand an agency a keyword list and a brief that says “write about X,” you’ll get competent, correct, forgettable content. Every competitor’s agency is working from a similar brief, researching the same top ten results, and producing something that sounds remarkably like everyone else’s.
The fix isn’t a better writer. It’s giving the agency something to work with that no competitor has access to.
Think of content production as two layers. The bottom layer is execution: the writing, the SEO structure, the publishing cadence. The top layer is strategy, the specific angle, the proprietary data, the point of view that makes a piece of content worth reading over the ten other pages already ranking for that keyword.
Most companies hire an agency for the bottom layer and assume the top layer will show up on its own. It won’t. That layer has to be built deliberately, usually by someone close to the business, and handed to the agency as raw material.
Without these, an agency is left interviewing search results instead of interviewing your business. The output reflects that.
Sit down with whoever is closest to the actual work, your senior strategists, your product team, your support team- and ask them what they’d tell a client if there was no time constraint. That unfiltered version is almost always more interesting than the polished brief that eventually gets handed to a writer.
Look at your own campaign results, product usage patterns, or client outcomes to find the numbers specific to your business. A stat like “62 per cent of our fintech clients saw their CAC drop within 90 days of switching acquisition mix” gives an agency something to build a real article around; a generic industry stat doesn’t. Our case studies are a good example of the kind of specific, sourced numbers that make a strategic layer credible instead of vague.
Before any brief goes to your agency, write a short document, one page is enough, stating what your company actually believes about the topic and what most other content gets wrong about it. This becomes the spine every brief pulls from, so the agency’s output stays consistent with your actual perspective instead of drifting toward generic industry language.
Hand your agency the point-of-view document, the proprietary data, and specific customer examples, along with the keyword and search intent. A brief that says “here’s our actual stance and the data behind it, now build the SEO structure around it” produces a completely different result than a brief that just says “write 1500 words on X.” This is the same principle our Content Marketing Agency team builds every brief around: strategy first, execution second.
When content comes back from your agency, don’t just check it for grammar and SEO compliance. Ask one question: could a competitor have published this exact piece? If the answer is yes, the strategic layer wasn’t strong enough in the brief, and it needs to go back before it goes to a proofreader.
Google’s own E-E-A-T guidance makes the same point directly: content built on real experience and a clear point of view is treated as more trustworthy than content that just restates what’s already ranking. Content built on a real point of view and real data gets cited more often, because it’s the version of the answer that’s actually different from what everyone else already published.
Our Generative Engine Optimisation service works at this exact layer, taking a company’s proprietary data and point of view and structuring it so that both search engines and AI models recognise it as the more complete, more citable source.
Firing your agency and hiring a new one rarely fixes generic content, because the new agency inherits the same gap the old one had. The fix sits with your own team, building the point of view and the proprietary insight that no agency can invent on your behalf. Once that layer exists, the same agency that was producing average content usually starts producing something genuinely distinct because, for the first time, they have something worth writing about.
Every company has a different gap between what their agency is capable of and what they’re actually being handed to work with. Grove, upGrowth’s AI growth strategist, can walk you through a focused diagnosis in under 4 minutes and show you exactly where that gap is.
If you’d rather go deeper with a live session on your actual content and briefs, our team is available for a 30-minute working session, no pitch, just your data. Start your diagnosis with Grove.
In This Article