| Map your startup’s growth maturity across 4 stages and identify the exact growth levers to pull next
Every founder we meet wants the same thing: faster growth. But faster growth means something completely different depending on where you are. A pre-PMF startup optimizing its paid ads channel is throwing money at a leaking bucket. A Series A company obsessing over founder-led sales is leaving cash on the table. The playbooks are different. The metrics are different. Even the definition of success is different.
Most growth frameworks treat all startups the same. They give you a growth hacking checklist, a conversion rate optimization template, or a content marketing roadmap. These tools assume you’re already productionized, you’ve found a channel that works, and you just need to scale it. That’s not where most startups live. Most are figuring out which channels even work in the first place.
The real gap isn’t between growing and not growing. It’s about knowing which growth stage you’re in and what to do about it. GVM bridges that gap by giving you a diagnostic before anything else.
The Growth Velocity Model maps startups across four distinct stages. Each stage has its own challenges, success metrics, and toolkit. Here’s the landscape:
| Stage | Growth Marker | Primary Challenge | Your Focus |
| Crawl | Pre-PMF | No repeatable channel | Find what works |
| Walk | PMF achieved, 1-2 channels | Systems not built | Scale what works |
| Run | Multiple channels, predictable growth | Team and expansion | Optimize and expand |
| Fly | Growth engine running | Efficiency and profitability | Compound and sustain |
Each stage builds on the previous one. You can’t run before you walk. You can’t fly before you run. The model isn’t linear in execution, but it is sequential in maturity.
The challenge
You have a product. You have early customers. What you don’t have is a repeatable way to acquire them. Growth at this stage is chaotic. It’s founder-led. Every customer is a miracle and you’re not sure why they came or how to find ten more like them.
What you’re really doing
Hypothesis testing at velocity. You’re running controlled experiments on different acquisition channels: direct outreach, content marketing, partnerships, paid ads, events. Most of these will fail. That’s expected. Your job is to fail faster and spot the signal early.
Our deliverables
Growth Readiness Assessment: An honest audit of your product, your market fit signals, and your acquisition infrastructure.
Channel Hypothesis Map: Ranked channels based on founder availability, budget, and early traction signals.
Growth Lever Prioritization: Clear ranking of what to test first and what metrics to watch.
Your outcome
You identify your top 3 growth levers to test and you run 12 weeks of focused experiments. At the end, you’ve either found a repeatable channel or you’ve confidently ruled out enough to point to what’s next.
Timeline
This stage typically takes 3-9 months depending on your burn rate, founder bandwidth, and market dynamics. You’re moving fast, staying bootstrapped, and learning about your customers in real time.
The challenge
You’ve proven something works. You’ve got one, maybe two channels that consistently bring customers. But it’s brittle. It lives in your founder’s head. It works when your founder is personally executing it. Scale this? Not a chance.
What you’re really doing
De-risking and formalizing. You’re documenting the repeatable process. You’re identifying the bottlenecks. You’re building the operational infrastructure that lets someone other than you execute it. You’re also testing if channel one plus channel two actually compound or if they cannibalize each other.
Our deliverables
Channel Efficiency Audit: Deep analysis of your working channel’s cost per acquisition, customer lifetime value, and contribution margin.
Growth Ops Blueprint: Standard operating procedures, tools, team structure, and early KPI dashboards.
Playbook Template: Documented framework for channel execution that can be handed to a growth hire or team.
Your outcome
You’ve built a growth system around your winning channel. It’s documented. It’s reproducible. You can now bring in a growth hire and hand them something real to execute.
Timeline
Walk typically lasts 6-18 months. Post-seed funding rounds sit here. You’re not yet at scale but you’re past the chaos of Crawl. You’re building what will eventually compound.
The challenge
You’ve got multiple channels working. Your team is growing. Your unit economics are positive. Now the leverage question becomes: how do you make each channel work better? How do you test new channels without cannibalizing your core? How do you scale a team that’s still figuring out what scale means?
What you’re really doing
Multi-channel optimization and expansion. You’re squeezing another 10-15% efficiency out of your core channels. You’re running controlled experiments on new channels without betting the farm. You’re building the team structure that lets you specialize: someone owns paid, someone owns organic, someone owns partnerships. You’re thinking about channel saturation and new market entry.
Our deliverables
Multi-Channel Growth Model: Interaction map between your channels. What compounds? What cannibalizes?
Team Structure Design: Org design that supports specialized channel ownership while maintaining cross-functional collaboration.
Channel Expansion Roadmap: Prioritized list of new channels to test based on your customer profile and competitive gaps.
Your outcome
You’ve got a predictable growth engine with clear unit economics per channel. You can now confidently hire a full growth team and delegate channel ownership. You understand what drives your growth and how different levers interact.
Timeline
Run is typically where Series A and B companies live. The stage lasts 12-30 months depending on your market size and competitive intensity. You’re scaling aggressively but with decreasing chaos.
The challenge
Your growth engine is running. The problem isn’t can we grow anymore. It’s how do we grow profitably? How do we enter new markets? How do we build moats that competitors can’t copy? Your leverage moves now are strategic, not tactical.
What you’re really doing
Efficiency optimization and strategic expansion. You’re cutting unit CAC by 5-20% through better targeting, better messaging, and channel mix optimization. You’re testing new geographic markets or customer segments where your core playbook might transfer. You’re thinking about retention, expansion revenue, and net retention rate as hard as you think about acquisition.
Our deliverables
Growth Efficiency Score: A single metric measuring your growth system’s maturity across 12 criteria on a 0-100 scale.
Market Expansion Playbook: Go-to-market strategy for one new market, segment, or use case.
Profitability Roadmap: Path to positive unit economics and sustainable growth margins.
Your outcome
You’ve shifted from growth at all costs to profitable growth at scale. You understand your growth ceiling in your core market and you’re making informed bets on where new growth comes from.
Timeline
Fly is where growth-stage and Series C+ companies live. You could stay in Fly for years, compounding advantage and expanding TAM.
Fi.Money entered our engagement at Walk stage. They had product-market fit. Their core product for no-fee banking for salaried professionals resonated strongly. Founder outreach and word-of-mouth were working. But it was chaotic. Acquisition cost was unclear. The team didn’t know what to double down on.
Our GVM diagnostic gave them three findings. Their organic channel had the highest lifetime value but was under-invested relative to their potential. Their team was biased toward paid acquisition because it was easier to measure, not because it was more efficient. Their documentation was poor. Best practices lived in Slack threads and founder memory.
We prescribed the Organic Compounding System framework. Over 12 months, they built a documented content and SEO playbook, hired a full-time content and SEO specialist, shifted their paid budget by 30% toward content amplification, and moved from 40% of ARR coming from organic to 65%.
After 12 months, they had reached Run stage. Multiple channels were working. Unit economics were stable. The team was no longer dependent on founder execution.
The key: diagnosis identified the right lever. Prescription was framework-specific. The growth didn’t happen because they followed a generic playbook. It happened because they knew their stage and what to pull.
If you’re unsure which growth lever to pull, the problem isn’t effort — it’s clarity.
The Growth Velocity Model tells you where you are, what’s holding you back, and which framework will move you forward next. No guesswork. No generic playbooks.
Diagnosis first. Growth second.
Amol has helped catalyse business growth with his strategic & data-driven methodologies. With a decade of experience in the field of marketing, he has donned multiple hats, from channel optimization, data analytics and creative brand positioning to growth engineering and sales.

Learn how funded startups can reduce reliance on paid marketing by building scalable organic growth engines across SEO, content, and brand.

Discover how books like The Lean Startup and Zero to One provide invaluable lessons and strategies for startup founders. Learn how reading can reduce failure rates and foster innovation.

Learn when Indian fintechs should move beyond performance marketing. Discover data-driven signals, CAC benchmarks, and how organic growth drives sustainable, trust-led scale.

Learn why organic growth is critical for FinTech sustainability. Discover strategies, metrics, and insights to build long-term health and attract high-intent users in 2026.
GVM diagnostics start at Rs 25,000 and go up to Rs 50,000 depending on your company size, revenue, and complexity. A typical engagement includes stakeholder interviews, platform audits, competitive analysis, and a detailed diagnostic report with prescription roadmap.
Plan for 2-3 weeks from kick-off to report delivery. We do 2-3 rounds of stakeholder interviews, analyze your data, build the GVS model, and synthesize the findings into actionable recommendations.
Yes, but differently. Pre-revenue GVS scores are hypothesis-based, not data-based. We’re assessing your product hypothesis, your market understanding, and your founder-market fit. The assessment is still valuable because it helps you decide what to test first. But expect less certainty and more validation-focused recommendations.
Most companies live between stages. You might be 70% Walk and 30% Run. That’s useful information. It tells you which prescriptions will land and which won’t. A company at 48 GVS, late Walk, will have a much different prescription than a company at 52 GVS, early Run, even though both are near the boundary.
Yes, but it’s repositioned. For growth-stage companies, GVM is less about where are we and more about where are the gaps in our system. We’re looking for growth stalls, channel saturation, inefficiency pockets, and expansion opportunities. The diagnostic is the same. The context changes.
Absolutely. GVM gives you a framework to assess another company’s growth maturity. You can run a diagnostic on a potential partner or acquisition target, understand their stage, and identify where friction will happen when you integrate.