Contributors:
Amol Ghemud Published: January 19, 2026
Summary
India’s EdTech sector is undergoing a structural reset. The post-pandemic phase has exposed the limits of hyper-growth models built on aggressive acquisitions, heavy CAC spending, and broad, undifferentiated GTM strategies. As seen in the trajectory of BYJU’S, once valued at $22 billion, rapid scale without operational discipline, governance rigor, and outcome validation can erode trust and financial sustainability just as quickly as it creates market dominance. At the same time, players like upGrad demonstrate how strategic pivots toward employability, geographic diversification, and institutional partnerships can unlock more resilient growth.
In This Article
Share On:
For nearly a decade, Indian EdTech was synonymous with speed—rapid user acquisition, aggressive fundraising, and the race to become an all-in-one “education super app.” The pandemic amplified this momentum, compressing years of adoption into months. But as classrooms reopened and capital markets tightened, the sector entered a period of correction. What once worked, blanket marketing, celebrity endorsements, and acquisition-led expansion, no longer guarantee growth or credibility.
Today, EdTech founders face a different challenge: how to scale responsibly without losing relevance or trust. This means knowing when to pivot the GTM strategy, deciding whether to double down on content breadth or learner conviction, and choosing expansion paths that align with changing student behavior, policy frameworks such as NEP 2020, and global mobility constraints.
This blog explores these questions through real-world case studies, market data, and practical frameworks, offering a clear lens on how Indian EdTech can move from survival to strategic, sustainable growth.
When Should EdTech Companies Pivot Their GTM Strategy?
Go-to-market (GTM) pivots in EdTech are rarely optional, they are usually triggered by structural signals in the market. The biggest mistake founders make is treating a GTM pivot as a marketing refresh, when in reality it is a business model correction.
The Three Clear Signals That Demand a GTM Pivot
1. CAC Keeps Rising but LTV Plateaus
During the hyper-growth phase, platforms masked inefficient GTM by pouring capital into ads and sales teams. When customer acquisition cost continues to rise while lifetime value remains flat, it signals weak conviction and poor retention. This often means the wrong persona is being targeted or the promise made at acquisition does not match the learning outcome delivered.
2. High Trial-to-Paid Drop-Off Despite Strong Top-of-Funnel
A healthy lead pipeline with low conversions post-demo or post-trial indicates a trust gap. In EdTech, this usually stems from over-indexing on features and content volume rather than on outcomes, teacher quality, or learner accountability. At this stage, GTM must pivot from “what the platform offers” to “what the learner becomes.”
3. Sales Cycles Start Lengthening Across Segment
Longer decision timelines, especially in K-12 and B2B upskilling, signal growing skepticism among parents, institutions, and learners. This is often driven by market fatigue and past sector excesses. A GTM pivot here requires fewer promises, stronger proof, and clearer positioning around measurable results.
How Successful EdTechs Execute GTM Pivots
From Broad to Narrow Personas
Instead of targeting “students” or “professionals,” winning platforms redefine ICPs around urgency:
Exam-in-6-months learners.
Career-switchers with <12 months runway.
Parents of academically lagging students, not toppers.
This shift reduces CAC and improves conversion quality.
From Content-Led to Conviction-Led Messaging
BYJU’S peak GTM emphasized scale, celebrity trust, and curriculum coverage. The correction phase across the industry shows a pivot toward:
Teacher credibility over brand celebrity.
Outcome timelines over course libraries.
Proof dashboards over testimonials.
From Sales Pressure to Assisted Validation
High-pressure telesales no longer work. Platforms now use:
Longer trials with structured checkpoints.
Parent/learner progress reports.
Low-ticket pilots before full commitment.
This increases trust and reduces refund risk.
Key Insight
A GTM pivot should happen before growth slows, not after cash burn forces it. The strongest EdTech companies treat GTM as a dynamic system, continuously recalibrated to learner behavior rather than investor narratives.
Content vs Conviction: Why More Courses No Longer Drive Scale.
For years, Indian EdTech equated scale with content expansion—more subjects, more grades, more certifications, and more recorded hours. This logic worked when demand was supply-constrained, and digital access was limited.
In 2026, the market is no longer constrained by content availability. It is constrained by learner conviction.
The Content Saturation Problem.
Most large EdTech platforms today face structural saturation.
Thousands of hours of content remain under-consumed.
Course completion rates hover below 15–20%.
Learners enroll but disengage within weeks of onboarding.
This creates a perception of abundance without impact. The promise of “everything under one roof” weakens trust when outcomes fail to materialize.
What Conviction Means in EdTech.
Conviction is the learner’s belief that:
This program aligns with a specific personal goal.
Completion is achievable within a defined time frame.
Participation will lead to a measurable academic or career outcome.
Conviction is not built through scale or volume. It is built through commitment mechanisms.
How Leading EdTechs Are Shifting from Content to Conviction.
1. Fewer Courses with Clear Outcomes.
Platforms are pruning large catalogs and focusing on flagship programs.
Clearly defined start and end dates are enforced.
Learning milestones and assessments are mandatory.
Success metrics are tied to outcomes, not enrollments.
2. Human Accountability Over Unlimited Access.
Unlimited access reduces urgency and completion intent. High-performing platforms introduce:
Assigned mentors or tutors for accountability.
Fixed cohorts instead of perpetual enrollments.
Live checkpoints, reviews, and enforced deadlines.
This mirrors the discipline of offline coaching within a digital environment.
3. Skin-in-the-Game Pricing Models.
Conviction increases when learners commit financially and psychologically.
Income Share Agreements (ISAs) align incentives.
Milestone-based payments reward progress.
Refunds are tied to participation, not enrollment.
These models filter out low-intent users and significantly improve cohort quality.
The BYJU’S Contrast.
BYJU’S expansion was optimized for reach rather than conviction.
Broad grade coverage, diluted focus.
Heavy reliance on recorded content reduced engagement.
As pandemic-driven demand normalized, weak learner commitment translated into refunds, churn, and reputational damage. The industry has internalized this correction.
If you’re evaluating practical applications, these AI-powered fintech tools by upGrowth are a useful reference
Expansion Playbooks: How and Where EdTech Should Scale Next.
Once GTM is corrected and conviction is restored, the next challenge is expansion. In 2026, EdTech expansion is no longer about entering every segment or geography simultaneously. It is about sequencing growth to protect unit economics and trust.
Expansion Is a Timing Problem, Not an Ambition Problem.
Most EdTech failures expand too early. Common premature moves include:
Launching new grades before fixing retention in the core segment.
Entering Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities without metro GTM validation.
Adding international markets before stabilizing domestic CAC and LTV.
Expansion should follow proof of repeatable success, not aspiration.
Three Proven Expansion Paths in Indian EdTech.
1. Segment-Deepening Before Segment-Broadening
The safest expansion path is vertical depth.
Expand from Grade 9 to Grade 10 before adding Grade 6.
Add advanced cohorts or exam-specific tracks before new subjects.
Introduce higher-value programs to the same user persona.
This approach leverages existing trust, reduces CAC, and improves LTV.
2. Geographic Expansion Through Assisted Models
Tier-2 and Tier-3 markets require a fundamentally different GTM.
Pure self-serve apps underperform due to low digital confidence.
Assisted learning through local mentors, centers, or partners improves adoption.
Hybrid offline-online models outperform fully digital offerings.
Successful platforms treat regional expansion as a product redesign, not a translation exercise.
3. B2C to B2B or B2B2C Transitions
Once outcomes are proven at the consumer level, institutional leverage follows.
Schools adopt platforms that parents already trust.
Employers partner with upskilling platforms that show placement success.
Governments engage vendors with measurable impact data.
This transition improves deal sizes and retention, but only after B2C proof exists.
The Middle East and APAC Expansion Logic.
EdTechs targeting international markets are shifting away from the U.S. and U.K. due to:
Visa uncertainty and rising education costs.
Slower ROI cycles for students.
Middle Eastern and APAC hubs offer:
Faster regulatory approvals.
Strong demand for the Indian curriculum and talent.
Hybrid online-to-offline degree pathways.
upGrad’s model of starting learners online and transitioning them to regional campuses reflects this capital-efficient expansion logic.
Expansion Readiness Checklist.
Before expanding, EdTech platforms must validate:
Stable CAC across three consecutive cohorts.
Retention above 60 percent for core programs.
Clear proof of learner outcome improvement.
Predictable sales cycles, not founder-dependent.
If any of these are weak, expansion will amplify failure rather than growth.
Key Insight.
Expansion magnifies both strengths and flaws.
Only EdTech platforms with conviction-led GTM, outcome clarity, and operational discipline should scale across segments or geographies.
EdTech Scaling Decision Matrix: When to Pivot, Expand, or Hold.
Growth Signal
What It Indicates
Correct Action
Risk If Ignored
Rising CAC with flat LTV.
GTM inefficiency or weak conviction.
Pivot messaging, channels, or pricing before scaling.
Scaling losses and marketing burn.
High trial sign-ups but low paid conversion.
Trust gap or unclear outcome proof.
Strengthen conviction via outcomes, mentors, or dashboards.
Funnel leakage and false demand signals.
Strong retention in one segment only.
Product-market fit is narrow but real.
Go deeper in the same segment first.
Premature diversification.
Founder-led sales are still required.
The sales process is not repeatable.
Systematize GTM before expansion.
Growth stalls when founders step back.
Tier-1 success, Tier-2 churn.
GTM mismatch, not product failure.
Redesign delivery with assisted or hybrid models.
Regional brand damage.
High engagement, low outcomes.
Activity without learning impact.
Redesign pedagogy and accountability.
Long-term trust erosion.
Strong B2C outcomes, inbound institutions.
Market validation achieved.
Explore B2B or B2B2C selectively.
Missed LTV leverage.
Content expansion outpacing retention.
Scale driven by volume, not value.
Pause content growth; fix conviction loops.
Platform commoditization.
Operating Metrics That Actually Indicate Scalable EdTech Growth.
Most EdTech platforms fail not because of poor products, but because they track the wrong metrics. Scale requires operating metrics that reflect trust, outcomes, and unit economics, not vanity growth.
1. Conviction Metrics (Pre-Scale Readiness).
These metrics indicate whether users believe in the product.
Trial-to-paid conversion rate by cohort and segment.
Parent or learner NPS collected after 30–45 days, not at onboarding.
Outcome validation rate, measured as % of users showing measurable improvement.
Repeat purchase or module expansion rate within 60–90 days.
If these metrics are weak, GTM or content expansion will amplify failure.
2. Funnel Health Metrics.
These metrics show whether GTM execution is working.
Cost per qualified lead, not cost per lead.
Trial activation rate within the first 7 days.
Drop-off points across TOFU, MOFU, and BOFU stages.
Time-to-conversion from first touch to payment.
Healthy funnels reduce dependence on discounts and sales pressure.
3. Retention and Outcome Metrics.
Retention in EdTech is outcome-driven, not engagement-driven.
Cohort-wise retention at 30, 60, and 120 days.
Completion rates for structured learning paths.
Attendance consistency for live or assisted learning formats.
Outcome-linked retention, measured against academic or career milestones.
High DAUs without outcomes signal future churn.
4. Unit Economics Metrics.
These metrics decide whether scaling is financially viable.
CAC by channel and segment, tracked monthly.
LTV by cohort, not blended averages.
CAC to LTV ratio, with a target of 1:3 or better.
Payback period: ideally 12–18 months for K-12 and 9 months for upskilling.
If unit economics do not improve with scale, expansion should pause.
5. Sales Efficiency Metrics (Especially for B2B and Hybrid Models).
These metrics reveal sales scalability.
Lead-to-deal conversion rate by sales rep.
Average sales cycle length by segment.
Pilot-to-contract conversion rate for institutions.
Revenue per sales head.
Long cycles are acceptable only if deal sizes justify them.
6. Expansion Readiness Metrics.
These metrics determine when to enter new geographies or segments.
Retention parity between core and expansion markets.
CAC inflation in new regions versus core markets.
Localized content adoption rates.
Dependency on founder-led sales or support.
Expansion without metric parity leads to silent cash burn.
Conclusion
Sustainable EdTech scale is no longer about more content; it’s about building conviction, trust, and measurable outcomes. Platforms that pivot GTM wisely, focus on learner success, and optimize operating metrics will outperform content-heavy competitors. Ultimately, EdTech is moving from being a growth story to a credibility business. Companies that treat trust, outcomes, and governance as growth levers rather than constraints will define the next decade of Indian and global education technology.
Ready to pivot your EdTech GTM and scale with conviction? Let upGrowth help you optimize your strategy, improve retention, and expand responsibly. Let’s Talk!
GTM Scaling Series
Edtech Scaling Strategy
Pivots & Conviction: Navigating the Path to Sustainable Scale.
The Foundation of Scale
🛡️
Founder Conviction
Core Focus: Pedagogical integrity. Scale in 2026 requires moving beyond “marketing arbitrage” to a core belief in the learning outcome, ensuring the product actually solves the competency gap it promises.
🔄
Strategic Pivots
Core Focus: Market responsiveness. Scaling isn’t linear; it requires the agility to pivot GTM channels or target segments (e.g., K-12 to Test Prep) when unit economics signal a plateau.
Tactical Scaling & Conviction
Operationalizing growth through deep market insight.
✔
Data-Driven Conviction: Moving from “gut feeling” to “signal detection.” Scaling decisions are backed by leading indicators like engagement depth and trial-to-paid velocity rather than just top-of-funnel volume.
✔
Infrastructure for Scale: Building the “Operations Stack” (LMS, CRM, and AI Support) before hitting the gas. Premature scaling without robust internal systems is the primary cause of Edtech burnout.
✔
Niche Dominance: Scaling by winning “one vertical at a time.” Establishing high trust and outcome-proof in a specific niche (like UPSC or Data Science) before horizontal expansion into adjacent categories.
Is your conviction backed by a scalable GTM engine?
1. Why are many EdTech companies struggling despite the strong demand for education?
Demand exists, but trust has eroded. Parents and learners now prioritize proof of outcomes, teaching quality, and ethical sales practices over content volume or brand visibility.
2. When should an EdTech company pivot its GTM strategy?
A pivot is necessary when CAC rises faster than LTV, trial-to-paid conversions fall, retention weakens, or growth depends heavily on discounts rather than outcomes.
3. Is content expansion still a viable growth strategy?
Content expansion works only when tied to clear user conviction. More courses without learner belief, teacher credibility, or outcome validation increase complexity without improving scale.
4. How do conviction-led platforms differ from content-led platforms?
Conviction-led platforms focus on outcomes, trust, and human validation. Content-led platforms focus on libraries, features, and breadth, often at the cost of engagement and retention.
5. What operating metrics matter most for EdTech scale today?
Trial-to-paid conversion, cohort retention, LTV: CAC ratio, payback period, learner outcomes, and referral rates matter more than downloads or session time.
6. Should Indian EdTech companies expand internationally?
Yes, but selectively. Middle East and APAC markets offer better alignment than the US/UK, provided expansion is backed by partnerships, localized delivery, and proven domestic unit economics.
For Curious Minds
A go-to-market (GTM) pivot is a deep, strategic correction of your business model, triggered by market signals indicating a misalignment between your product, price, and persona. It is not just a marketing refresh; it addresses fundamental flaws revealed when metrics like rising CAC are no longer masked by venture capital. Failing to see this distinction is a common reason EdTech startups struggle to achieve sustainable growth.
Successful pivots involve re-evaluating core components of your business:
Ideal Customer Profile (ICP): Shifting from broad categories like 'students' to high-urgency segments such as 'career-switchers with <12 months runway' to improve conversion quality.
Value Proposition: Moving from content-led messaging (e.g., thousands of courses) to conviction-led messaging focused on guaranteed outcomes and teacher credibility.
Sales Process: Transitioning from high-pressure telesales to an assisted validation model that uses structured trials and progress reports to build trust before a purchase.
This re-calibration ensures your entire model aligns with new learner behaviors, which is explored in greater detail throughout this analysis.
The definition of scale in Indian EdTech has matured from user acquisition metrics to measures of learner success and long-term value. Previously, scale meant having the largest course library or the most app downloads. Today, true scale is about building deep learner conviction, demonstrated by high completion rates, measurable skill improvements, and strong retention, as the market no longer rewards growth without profitability.
This evolution demands a strategic shift in focus:
From Content to Outcomes: Instead of marketing the breadth of your course catalog, you should highlight specific, time-bound outcomes, such as job placement rates or salary increases.
From Celebrity to Credibility: Trust is now built on the credibility of instructors and tangible proof of results, not celebrity endorsements, a lesson learned from the sector's correction phase.
From Acquisition to Retention: The emphasis is on increasing LTV by ensuring learners feel accountable and supported, which reduces churn and improves unit economics.
Understanding this new paradigm of scale is the first step toward building a resilient EdTech company, a theme we unpack further.
A conviction-led strategy significantly outperforms a content-led one for professional upskilling by directly addressing the learner's primary motivation: career outcomes. While a content-led approach emphasizes 'what we offer' (e.g., 500 hours of video), a conviction-led approach focuses on 'what you will become' (e.g., a data scientist in six months). This shift builds trust by selling a transformation, not a commodity. The choice depends on whether your goal is to attract browsers or convert serious career-switchers.
Consider the practical differences:
Content-Led: Lists features, course titles, and instructor credentials. This can lead to high trial-to-paid drop-off as users get lost in options without a clear path.
Conviction-Led: Showcases proof dashboards with placement stats, provides clear learning timelines, and uses testimonials that speak to career progression. This model, adopted by successful platforms, creates urgency and justifies a premium price.
Choosing the right approach is critical for GTM success, and the full article provides a framework for making this decision.
The market's reaction to the excesses of the hyper-growth era provides clear evidence that celebrity-driven marketing is losing its effectiveness. As seen with platforms like BYJU’S, a GTM strategy built on celebrity trust and curriculum coverage failed to prevent rising skepticism and lengthening sales cycles once the pandemic-fueled urgency subsided. This indicates a fundamental shift in what parents and learners value. Credibility is now earned through tangible proof, not borrowed from a famous face.
The key evidence points include:
Lengthening Sales Cycles: Parents and institutions are taking more time to decide, signaling that high-profile endorsements no longer accelerate trust.
Demand for Proof: Customers now demand outcome data and progress reports over vague testimonials, a sign that they are looking for substance over style.
Focus on Instructors: Competing platforms are successfully differentiating by highlighting the expertise and relatability of their teachers, proving that authentic authority builds stronger connections.
This pivot from brand celebrity to teacher credibility is a core theme for sustainable growth, which we explore with more examples.
High drop-off rates after a trial signal a critical trust gap, which successful EdTech firms now address by replacing feature-heavy demos with assisted validation. This new approach focuses on giving users a tangible sense of progress and a clear vision of the final outcome. Instead of showcasing the platform's functionality, it proves the platform's value by helping learners achieve a small, meaningful win during the trial period itself.
Effective outcome-oriented validation strategies include:
Structured Trials: Offering longer trials with specific checkpoints and goals, guiding the learner through a pre-defined path to a small success.
Progress Reports: Sending parents or learners automated reports during the trial, highlighting engagement and areas of improvement to demonstrate real-time value.
Low-Ticket Pilots: For B2B or high-value courses, offering a paid, low-cost introductory module before asking for a full commitment, which reduces risk and builds confidence.
These methods transform a trial from a passive tour into an active, trust-building experience, a crucial pivot detailed further in this report.
EdTech companies that fail to pivot from an acquisition-led model face a future of diminishing returns and potential obsolescence. In a capital-constrained environment, a GTM strategy dependent on high ad spend and large sales teams to mask poor retention is unsustainable. The long-term implications are severe, as the market is now prioritizing unit economics and genuine learning outcomes over vanity growth metrics.
Companies clinging to the old playbook will likely experience:
Inability to Fundraise: Investors are now scrutinizing CAC to LTV ratios, and platforms with a leaky bucket will be unable to secure further funding.
Brand Erosion: Aggressive sales tactics and unfulfilled promises lead to negative word-of-mouth and brand damage, which is difficult to repair in a skeptical market.
Market Share Loss: More nimble competitors focused on specific, high-conviction niches will capture discerning customers, leaving unfocused 'super apps' to struggle with a disengaged user base.
Adapting your GTM is not just about survival, it is about positioning for leadership in the next phase of EdTech, a strategic imperative we analyze in depth.
The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 requires Indian EdTech leaders to shift from supplementary content providers to integrated learning partners. To ensure long-term relevance, you must align your product with NEP’s emphasis on experiential learning, critical thinking, and flexible academic structures. A go-to-market strategy that ignores this policy shift risks being perceived as outdated or misaligned with the future of Indian education.
Proactive adaptation involves several key adjustments:
Product Development: Focus on building tools for project-based learning, multidisciplinary courses, and formative assessments rather than just test-prep content.
GTM Messaging: Position your platform as a tool that helps schools and students implement NEP 2020 guidelines, turning compliance into a competitive advantage.
Partnership Models: Move beyond direct-to-consumer sales and develop robust B2B2C models that integrate your solutions directly into school ecosystems.
Aligning with macro trends like NEP 2020 is crucial for building a durable EdTech business, a strategic point this article expands upon.
To combat lengthening sales cycles, a K-12 startup must replace high-pressure tactics with a trust-building assisted validation model. This pivot shifts the focus from 'closing a deal' to 'proving value,' which resonates with skeptical parents. The goal is to guide them and their child through a journey that demonstrates your platform's impact firsthand, making the purchase a logical next step rather than a pressured decision.
A practical implementation plan includes these steps:
Redefine the Trial: Extend the free trial period but structure it with clear weekly goals and communication checkpoints.
Automate Progress Reports: During the trial, send weekly emails to parents summarizing their child’s activity, progress on specific topics, and areas needing attention.
Train Sales as 'Academic Counselors': Repurpose your sales team to act as guides who help parents interpret progress reports and understand the learning path, rather than just pushing for a payment.
This approach builds confidence and reduces refund risk, forming a more sustainable GTM strategy that we detail further.
Systematically narrowing your ideal customer profile (ICP) is one of the most effective ways to slash customer acquisition cost (CAC) and improve conversion quality. Moving from a generic 'professional' target to a high-urgency persona like 'career-switchers with less than 12 months runway' allows you to create highly resonant messaging that cuts through the noise. This focus ensures your marketing budget is spent only on leads who have a pressing need for your solution.
The process involves three key actions:
Analyze Your Best Customers: Interview your most successful learners to identify common triggers, timelines, and career goals that prompted their purchase.
Map Urgency Triggers: Identify specific events that create an immediate need, such as a recent layoff, a company adopting new technology, or hitting a career plateau.
Refine Marketing Channels and Messaging: Tailor your ad copy, landing pages, and content to speak directly to these triggers and pain points on platforms where these personas are most active.
This targeted approach is fundamental to efficient scaling, and the full article provides a worksheet for defining your own urgency-driven ICP.
The most common mistake founders make with rising CAC is treating it as a marketing problem to be solved with more ad spend or different channels. This is a symptom-level fix. The real issue is often a deeper mismatch between the value promised at acquisition and the actual outcome delivered, which leads to weak conviction and poor word-of-mouth, forcing you to pay more for every new user. Reframing the problem correctly is the first step toward a real solution.
Here is how to address the root cause:
Diagnose the Value Gap: Instead of A/B testing ads, analyze post-trial drop-off reasons and early-stage churn. This data reveals if your promise is misaligned with the user experience.
Strengthen the Core Offer: Invest in improving teacher quality, learner accountability features, and clearer paths to outcomes rather than just optimizing your marketing funnel.
Pivot to Proof: Shift your messaging from promises to proof. Use tangible results, like 'proof dashboards,' to build trust organically and lower your reliance on paid acquisition.
This strategic shift from marketing tactics to core value is a key theme for building a resilient EdTech business, which we explore further.
A healthy lead pipeline with low conversions points directly to a trust gap between your marketing promises and the perceived value of your product. Learners and parents are fatigued by grand claims and want tangible proof before committing. When your GTM over-indexes on features and content volume during a demo, it fails to build the conviction needed for a high-value purchase, causing this drop-off.
A pivot to providing tangible proof can effectively bridge this gap:
Proof Dashboards: Instead of testimonials, show anonymized, aggregated data on student performance improvement, project completion rates, or even job placements. This turns marketing claims into verifiable facts.
Personalized Progress Reports: During a trial, provide learners with reports that highlight their specific achievements and progress. This creates a sense of momentum and demonstrates the platform’s direct impact.
This strategy moves the conversation from 'what the platform has' to 'what the learner achieves,' a crucial step in building the trust needed for conversion.
Expanding by adding more courses is a content-led strategy focused on capturing a wider audience, while deepening engagement is a conviction-led strategy aimed at maximizing the value for existing users. The former often leads to a 'jack of all trades, master of none' problem with high CAC and low LTV. The latter builds a loyal user base with strong retention, which is the foundation of sustainable, profitable growth in the current market.
Your decision should be guided by these factors:
Unit Economics: If your CAC is rising and LTV is flat, you must deepen engagement first. Focus on improving completion rates and outcomes in your core offering before expanding.
Market Position: If you are in a crowded market, deepening engagement around a specific niche creates a stronger competitive moat than adding another generic course.
Learner Feedback: If users are asking for more support and accountability features, prioritize engagement. If they are successfully completing courses and asking for advanced topics, content expansion may be viable.
Choosing the right path is a critical strategic decision, and the full analysis provides a framework to help guide your choice.
Amol has helped catalyse business growth with his strategic & data-driven methodologies. With a decade of experience in the field of marketing, he has donned multiple hats, from channel optimization, data analytics and creative brand positioning to growth engineering and sales.
Growth Strategy and Planning
